[Tig] Lawrence Of Arabia

Craig Dingwall Craig.Dingwall at nfsa.gov.au
Mon Nov 5 21:37:21 GMT 2012

I wonder if David in the movie "Prometheus" was watching the 4K version, 
while the rest of the crew was in stasis?

From:   David Bernstein <d_bernstein2000 at yahoo.com>
To:     Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us>, Jack James 
<jack at surrealroad.com>, 
Cc:     Telecine Internet Group <tig at tig.colorist.org>
Date:   06/11/2012 06:23 AM
Subject:        Re: [Tig] Lawrence Of Arabia
Sent by:        tig-bounces at colorist.org

Sohonet www.sohonet.co.uk sponsors the TIG.
Support from Digital Vision www.digitalvision.tv

Here's a very detailed article about the recent restoration, which will be 
the version on the upcoming BD/DVD release. I saw the US premiere of the 
4K DCP, which was quite beautiful and has none of the flaws mentioned 
previously. I don't know anything about the BFI screening referred to, but 
it sounds like it may have been a print from the previous (photochemical) 
restoration, which did have some of those issues. 


From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us>
>To: Jack James <jack at surrealroad.com> 
>Cc: Telecine Internet Group <tig at tig.colorist.org> 
>Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 6:50 AM
>Subject: Re: [Tig] Lawrence Of Arabia
>Sohonet http://www.sohonet.co.uk/ sponsors the TIG.
>Support from Digital Vision http://www.digitalvision.tv/
>On Mon, 5 Nov 2012, Jack James wrote:
>> The issues that bothered me were the massive colour changes between 
shots, several dropped frames, and some bounce,
>> so nothing consistent, and I've been told by other people that it must 
have been a different version to the one that
>> will be on the bluray.
>I hope so.  Previously a DVD came out in 2001 and it is possible that 
further work was done for DVD re-release in 2008.  The Blu-ray is supposed 
to be based on an 8K scan which is reduced to a 4K DI process.  It would 
be interesting to know the DI workflow which was used.
>Likely Jim Houston knows when the transfer for the Blu-ray took place and 
if it has any digital relation to the work done in 2008.
>No one was using 4K DI processes back in 2001. 2K would have been state 
of the art.  By 2008 we had some films using 4K processes.
>-- Bob Friesenhahn
>bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us, 
>GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/

More information about the Tig mailing list