[Tig] Discussion of scanners

Jeff Kreines - Mindspring jeffkreines at mindspring.com
Fri Feb 5 18:35:19 GMT 2016

> On Feb 5, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Ted Langdell via Tig <tig at colorist.org> wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Buck Bito - Movette via Tig <tig at colorist.org <mailto:tig at colorist.org>> wrote:
>> But for instance, since the primary grading UI for the FlashscanHD is acting on the lamp and is
>> very easy to alter for a pickup take, we deal with serious color issues like tungsten film outdoors on the scanner to get it 'in range' and that way our clients have more bits to push around in post for the real
>> grading.

Ted, when you quoted the above from Buck, you left out a significant part of his post — this:

> The level of control we have on the Kinetta far surpasses both of our
> other scanners and has allowed us to pull usable files out of underexposed
> super-8 that was essentially black coming out of either our Scanstation or
> our FlashscanHD no matter what we tried on those machines.

Selective quoting doesn’t really help advance the conversation.

Thanks to a certain anonymous TIG member for pointing this out.


Jeff Kreines

More information about the Tig mailing list