[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Colorists & DPs
With regard to the comments made by Jean Clement regarding the issue
of the DP & the Colorist I can only agree with the support he has received
from other members of the TIG and state that I too found his article clear
concise and informative.
A few months ago when this subject was raised it led to some of the most
heated and passionate debate on this forum and, despite the showing at
NAB and elsewhere of the " new technologies " designed to interface
the DP's exposures to the Colorists fingers, this will always be an area of
The irony of the situation is that no matter which type of reference system is
used to bring the DP's vision to our monitors they will all demand a measure
of cost, be it in hardware or time, that the "budget" transfer house may be
unable or unwilling to make, whilst those that are heavy "investors" probably
already have the personal contact with the DP's that Jean Clemont and others
have pointed out is the most effective solution.
I would like to say, before I also get shot down, that I use the term "budget "
sense that Mark and others have, in that the client does "get what they pay for
perhaps the DP's should get more support from line producers when these
decisions are made. The same consideration should also be given to the quality
of viewing format and monitor as low quality here is no way to judge the
efforts, or the DP's.
With regard to Kens question on Safe Area Generators the new Pandora digital
one is called Linus whilst the analogue version is called Lionel. Linus will be
released soon and will be at IBC in September.