[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: KeyKode numbers rollover

WillAbbott at aol.com wrote:
> The "converter" should have noticed the film's prefix number increment up by
> 1 when the
> frame count went from 9999 to 0000 and allow the changeover to occur.  Sounds
> like a
> software problem.
> -----
> mailing list available as a digest..list your gear/jobs in web classified
> inquiries to rob at alegria.com     http://www.alegria.com/telecinehome.html

In the course of transferring about one hundred and twenty thousand
feet if Fuji 35mm negative for a low budget feature, the KK numbers
rolled over a total of 10 times. I have never seen it roll over while
transferring Kodak negative. I suspect that Fuji is adhering to the
letter of the KK standard and is not aware of the spirit that the
prefix is not meant to be a calculable number. Theoretically it should
not be a problem as long as the negative cutter is aware of this

Martin Zeichner