[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I've spoken with people mastering for DVD, and they state that there are no
secondary compression artifacts when the source material comes from D-Beta
I've also seen the picture from several DVD disks, and I believe the
statement that that "the picture quality of DVD approaches that of D-1" is
true. That is, if the approach is from several miles away. 5 Mbit/sec
MPEG-2 has certain undeniable and unmistakeable artifacts, particulary in
flat fields, sharp edges, and certain motion sequences. While the overall
picture quality is definitely better that that possible from a VHS tape,
there is no way it looks exactly like uncompressed 601. Period.
At 05:04 AM 7/2/96 PDT, Rob Lingelbach wrote:
>--- Forwarded mail from SgtRT at aol.com
>I have not seen DVD and could not comment on its look. I have heard that
>transfers for DVD must be made to D1. The reason given is that formats using
>compression techniques (Digital Beta, DCT) cause DVD to exhibit artifacts due
>to the incompatible re-compression of information. Can anyone confirm this?
>sgtrt at aol.com
>sgtrt at primenet.com
>--- End of forwarded message from SgtRT at aol.com
>mailing list available as a digest..list your gear/jobs in web classified
>inquiries to rob at alegria.com http://www.alegria.com/telecinehome.html
Digital Media Technologies, Inc.
andymal at primenet.com