[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More DTV Concerns
- To: "telecine" <telecine at sun.alegria.com>
- Subject: Re: More DTV Concerns
- From: "Martin Euredjian" <martinfx at email.msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 12:42:05 -0800
- Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 12:45:48 -0800
- Resent-From: telecine at alegria.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"bOvMDD.A.hIH.IbZl0" at sun>
- Resent-Sender: telecine-request at alegria.com
- Resent-To: multiple recipients of <telecine at alegria.com>
>Wait a minute, if recording 59.94 HDTV should theoretically save
>material costs, how come my D1-76 minute tape at 625 25 fps doesn't cost
>any less than my D1-76 minute tape at 525 59.94???
The 601 format results in 27 million samples per second regardless of the
video standard used (13.5 for Y and 6.75 ea. Cb,Cr). This means that you
would use the same amount of tape per unit of time. Had the tape format
been optimized for each particular standard you would end-up with a longer
tape for PAL and shorter for NTSC --and a resulting cost discrepancy.
The HDTV assumption is based on the assumption that if the only variable
were the frame-rate, a higher rate would require more storage.
John Abt of AJA Video in Grass Valley supports the TIG in 1997-8
TIG subscriber count is 908 on Mon Dec 15 12:44:51 PST 1997
complete information on the TIG website http://www.alegria.com/tig3/