[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: day for night
- To: telecine at sun.alegria.com, martin at hollydig.com
- Subject: Re[2]: day for night
- From: ranthony at duart.com
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 0:34:51 -0500
- Resent-Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 22:01:58 -0800
- Resent-From: telecine at alegria.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"FVVFLB.A.KjD.m0bt0" at sun>
- Resent-Sender: telecine-request at alegria.com
- Resent-To: multiple recipients of <telecine at alegria.com>
Martin Euredjian wrote:
<Folks at the CML list may be a lot more familiar with what to do for
<a conventional film finish situation where you have the lab do the
<color timing. Still, it'd be interesting to learn what the non-video
<folks have to say about this.
Not so Martin. You have to remember that only something on the order
of 25% of the negative exposed today EVER gets printed to film. The
vast majority is transferred to video and as a result I don't know if
I would consider today's cinematographers "non-video folks". A DP
today is fast gaining as much (or more) new information about video as
he or she is about film.
Rick Anthony
---
Thanks to Gary Adams for support of the TIG in 1998
TIG subscriber count is 910 on Thu Jan 8 22:01:05 PST 1998
complete information on the TIG website http://www.alegria.com/tig3/