[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: anonymity (sign posts)
- To: "Martin Euredjian" <martin at hollydig.com>, multiple recipients of <telecine at alegria.com>
- Subject: Re: anonymity (sign posts)
- From: rob at alegria.com (Rob Lingelbach)
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 07:25:01 -0800
- In-Reply-To: "Martin Euredjian" <martin at hollydig.com> "Re: anonymity (sign posts)" (Feb 17, 1:04)
- Organization: Altruistic Intentions, Hollywood, CA
- Phone-number: +1 213 464 6266
- Reply-To: Rob Lingelbach <rob at alegria.com>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 07:25:56 -0800
- Resent-From: telecine at alegria.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"xRnepD.A.IIE.Uva60" at sun>
- Resent-Sender: telecine-request at alegria.com
- Resent-To: multiple recipients of <telecine at alegria.com>
- Sender: Rob Lingelbach <rob at sun.alegria.com>
On Feb 17, 1:04, "Martin Euredjian" wrote:
} Subject: Re: anonymity (sign posts)
> What is needed is a version of "filtering" that allows you to say something
> like: if a message is going to the following recipients use this signature,
> else, use that one, etc, etc. Does this exist?
This would be a function of the MUA (mail user agent) and my Unix
agents do allow for switching .sig files.
One can find out more by monitoring the comp.mail.* groups; we should
probably drop this from TIG traffic.
Rob Lingelbach | 2660 Hollyridge Dr., Los Angeles, CA 90068
rob at alegria.com |"I care not much for a man's religion whose dog or
rob at info.com | cat is not the better for it." --Abraham Lincoln
rob at teklab.com KB6CUN http://www.alegria.com
Thanks to Blake Jones for support of the TIG in 1998.
No product marketing allowed on the main TIG. Contact rob at alegria.com
927 subscribers in 37 countries on Tue Feb 17 07:25:03 PST 1998
complete information on the TIG website http://www.alegria.com/tig3/