[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Transformania (geometry)
Err, are we talking hight against width? Cos if its that, its easy to
its something please be more clear as I used to run a MK 111 Jumpscan
1981 and Geometry had a whole different meaning then :-)
(those of you too young to remember, them were the days!)
Care to comment Mr.Satin??
Ken (ex jumpscan) Robinson
bob at bluescreen.com wrote:
> >The first thing I noticed, was that the "GEOMETRY" was different
> >two machines. One of the Machines had a decided thinning effect on
> >compared to the other.
> This was, to me, the most interesting comment posted to date, and the
> with great potential for far reaching repercussions.
> Will overweight stars now insist their footage be done on the rig that
> makes them look thinner?
> Anyone else notice this or care to comment?
Av.Cristobal Colon 4733
Santiago de Chile
Phone +56 2 207 9515
Fax +56 2 228 5871
186,282.396 miles per second. Not just a good idea..... It's the LAW!