[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Digi Beta versus D1
- To: " TK Internet Group" <telecine at alegria.com>
- Subject: Digi Beta versus D1
- From: "MICHEL LAPOINTE" <mlapoint at astral.com>
- Date: 16 Sep 1998 22:34:32 U
- Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 21:37:26 -0500
- Resent-From: telecine at alegria.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"EtNRsB.A.6TC.7WHA2" at sun>
- Resent-Sender: SmartList account <slist at sun.alegria.com>
- Resent-To: multiple recipients of <telecine at alegria.com>
Subject: Time: 22:25
OFFICE MEMO Digi Beta versus D1 Date: 98/09/16
I recently had a discussion with a client concerning the following problem.
Project was creating video master from a 35mm low con print. Distributor's contract
demanded a D1 master tape.
I suggested to my client to do a Digi Beta transfer and work the intermediate steps
in digi beta (original sound stripping, credits inserts, dusting...) and then make a D1 dub
of the digi Beta master tape. No analog steps: Digital all the way.
The answer was no. His argument was that all steps had to be D1 from beginning to end because Digi beta meant compression therefore loss of quality.
My question to everybody: Is there a way of knowing , by examining the final D1 tape, that digi Beta was used in the process, for maybe 2-3 generations. The answers I got so far are
inconclusive. I am being told about possible picture content induced artifacts but without
anything being said about which picture would create what artefacts.
Projects is going fine now in D1 all the way, , but I'm still puzzled.
What do you think ?
Thanks to Tom McMahon and Microsoft for support in 1998.
No product marketing allowed on the main TIG. Contact rob at alegria.com
1014 subscribers in 39 countries on Wed Sep 16 21:36:38 CDT 1998
subscribe/unsubscribe with that Subject: to telecine-request at alegria.com
complete information on the TIG website http://www.alegria.com/tig3/