[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
paper review (was: The world of CRT)
- To: multiple recipients of <telecine at alegria.com>
- Subject: paper review (was: The world of CRT)
- From: rob at alegria.com (Rob Lingelbach)
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 20:11:33 -0600
- In-Reply-To: orton at popstudios.com (Mike the Brit [Michael Orton]) "[TIG] The world of CRT" (Oct 29, 16:54)
- Organization: Altruistic Intentions
- Phone-number: +1 214 887 8544
- Reply-To: Rob Lingelbach <rob at alegria.com>
- Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 20:12:19 -0600
- Resent-From: telecine at alegria.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"DyL0fD.A.u3E.cBSO2" at sun>
- Resent-Sender: SmartList account <slist at alegria.com>
- Resent-To: multiple recipients of <telecine at alegria.com>
On Oct 29, 16:54, Mike the Brit [Michael Orton] wrote:
} Subject: [TIG] The world of CRT
> presented cries out for review. I'd like to recommend that about a
> half-dozon TIGrs be available for a peer review process, nominated by
> people on the TIG. I'll start off by nominating Dave Corbitt and Martin
> Euridjian for this job.
fine nominations indeed. I submit then the following list of 6
TIG'ers for the review board:
More importantly to me, however, is what we're trying to do here--
will there ever be any other "papers" for review? Perhaps. I
suppose, if for no other purpose, anything we can do to provide
verification of materials available on the World Wide Web is
beneficial; I'm amazed at how much misinformation is published on the
internet. Whatever happened to the job of editor?
SMPTE has a formal submission, review, and acceptance process for
technical papers. I imagine that what Mike is proposing here is that
the TIG 'review board' authenticate authoritative engineering
materials (AEM's) presented on behalf of our membership-- on the web,
via ftp, or other means, and in a considerably less formal atmosphere
than that of SMPTE. I'm just not sure how many AEM's we're going to
have (who has the time?). We're an informal group, by definition,
though with a steady, responsible core.
Other comments always welcome. I've sent the author of the CRT paper
a compiliation of responses, perhaps he'll respond. In the meantime,
I'll leave the document up but with pointers to the (strong)
responses.. no doubt it will be best to remove it soon.
(ps. the subject of this thread could have been changed to "pay per
(re)view" but those outside of the US might not have caught it)
Rob Lingelbach | "I would give nothing for that man's religion
rob at alegria.com | whose very dog and cat are not the better for it."
www.alegria.com --Rowland Hill, "Village Dialogues"
Thanks to Sam Holtz for support in 1998.
No product marketing allowed on the main TIG. Contact rob at alegria.com
1014 subscribers in 38 countries on Thu Oct 29 20:11:35 CST 1998
subscribe/unsubscribe with that Subject: to telecine-request at alegria.com
complete information on the TIG website http://www.alegria.com/tig3/