[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Advice for SCC and Rank MKIII-C Digi 4.

To: "'telecine at alegria.com'" <telecine at alegria.com>
Subject: RE: Advice for SCC and Rank MKIII-C Digi 4.
From: Graham Collett <graham.collett at vtr.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 17:52:52 -0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 11:52:50 -0600
Resent-From: telecine at alegria.com
Resent-Message-ID: <"8rdFf.A.GJG.9Gwy2" at sun>
Resent-Sender: telecine-request at alegria.com
Resent-To: multiple recipients of <telecine at alegria.com>



> The reason the old correctors were offered pre-store was to avoid
> noise by
> taking the signal before digitisation and staying in the analog
> domain. They
> were/are analog boxes. The signal was then fed back to the telecine
> store
> for digitisation. 
> 
	The original colour correctors were designed to implement colour
correction in a logorythmic / film environment. To do otherwise was not
technically correct. Noise was  a separate consideration. Then, 47db in
luminance was enough, but we all strived for that little bit more. Our
diamond is currently looking at 68db (measured a while back)
	Graham Collett
	VTR

---
Thanks to Robin Castle for support in 1999.
No advertising/marketing allowed on the main TIG.  Contact rob at alegria.com
anonymous messaging now at http://www.alegria.com/HyperNews/get/ubique.html
1033 subscribers in 41 countries on Wed Feb 17 11:51:52 CST 1999 
subscribe/unsubscribe with that Subject: to telecine-request at alegria.com
complete information on the TIG website http://www.alegria.com/tig3/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Advice for SCC and Rank MKIII-C Digi 4.
  - From: "Michael C. Kaye" <m.c.kaye at ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Advice for SCC and Rank MKIII-C Digi 4.
Next by Date: Greed
Prev by thread: Re: Advice for SCC and Rank MKIII-C Digi 4.
Next by thread: Re: Advice for SCC and Rank MKIII-C Digi 4.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread