[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Electronic Cinema
Christopher Bacon wrote:
> ...in my opinion, the Hughes/JVC light amplifier didn't have quite enough
> brightness or contrast for the job, and the TI prototype cinema DLP
> evidenced motion artifacts and insufficient tonal range when I saw it last
I don't know about what you saw and where, but at the most recent demo
I was very impressed. Although I can critique other aspects of the EC,
especially with the Hughes, contrast and certainly light output was not a
problem. In fact both EC projectors, especially the TI were much brighter
than even the film projection.
Motion artifacts? This is the first I've heard that. There were absolutely
no motion artifacts at all. What motion artifacts did you see? I was very
surprised and impressed with the very close match they were able to
achieve to a flat 1:85 print and with the general progression of both technologies.
EC is not yet though capable of approaching the quality of a good c/s print
with its present resolution limitations.
Thanks to DAV and Dave Walker for support in 1999
No advertising/marketing allowed on the main TIG. Contact rob at alegria.com
anonymous messaging now at http://www.alegria.com/HyperNews/get/ubique.html
1019 subscribers in 41 countries on Thu May 6 11:20:40 CDT 1999
subscribe/unsubscribe with that Subject: to telecine-request at alegria.com
complete information on the TIG website http://www.alegria.com/tig3/