[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Geoff Boyle wrote:
> 4) Maybe there's be a split in market, small well written films only
> distributed to HDTV and DVD and then there'll be the events in stereo Imax
> 5) Image quality, the audience may not know why they like or dislike
> something but they quickly vote with their pockets when they have a
> comparative choice and the difference is clear.
I just saw a whole bunch of I-max films ( well three), One in Stereo.
The stereo one unfortunately wasn't so great ( L-5 first city in space),
I think part of it was sitting to close to the screen, and part of it
was the polarizing lenses weren't efficient enough, and I did see some
image bleeding. I wonder if the average viewer will find this enough To
justify spending $20? or more dollars a ticket to go see a movie.
because that is where it is headed. I remember when movies first hit $5
a ticket. Our family ( all 6 of us ) stopped going to see them entirely.
Movies are going to have to get Better, and better, as a complete show,
unfortunately it isn't going to happen as projection just gets worse and
worse. Besides which, how many prints of films that open in a thousand
or more theaters nationwide are really first quality, and how many are
rushed, and not pristine?
As for Image Quality, only time will tell if there is a difference, that
affects the audience enough to hurt the box office, but I imagine once
we get Electronic projection into theaters. The brand new perfectly
tuned projectors will push out the film projectors, even if people
respond better to film projection ( or origination) at that time the
only choice will be Electronic.
On a personal opinion Tangent. I saw "Gods and Monsters" Very Crisp and
clean and just what you expect from a professional film, The "Black and
White " Silhouette of the monster walking was just wonderfully done,
especially as it seems to have been shot in color, and lit and art
directed to B + W. The color only becoming apparent at the end of the
sequence. Still with all this modern film stock technology projected in
front of me, there was a beautiful quality to the shots from the
original Frankenstein film that were used. Not as sharp, not as crisp,
but very pleasing.
Brooklyn, Based Cinematographer
Thanks to DAV and Dave Walker for support in 1999
No advertising/marketing allowed on the main TIG. Contact rob at alegria.com
anonymous messaging now at http://www.alegria.com/HyperNews/get/ubique.html
1020 subscribers in 41 countries on Sat May 8 00:40:59 CDT 1999
subscribe/unsubscribe with that Subject: to telecine-request at alegria.com
complete information on the TIG website http://www.alegria.com/tig3/