[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The curse of Kubrick
U.K.'s "Independent on Sunday", yesterday, reported the following article.
How much of this, do you think is true?
A unique new print of the classic film 2001: A Space Odyssey which was
personally supervised by the director Stanley Kubrick will be shown for the
first time next month.
Kubrick spent the last five years of his life overseeing the making of the
new print, the first since the film was released 30 years ago. It was
commissioned by the National Film and Television Archive in Britain for its
Treasures of the Archives collection of significant films and paid for with
a five-figure donation from the millionaire John Paul Getty.
But Kubrick was so appalled by what he claimed were the wrong gradations of
colour in the first attempt that he took it home to Hertfordshire and
harangued all those involved in the project until it was right. David
Meeker, the keeper of fiction film at the archive, said: "I couldn't get my
print back. He said the whole world was incompetent. But Stanley did this
because he wanted the British Film Institute to have the very best, most
up-to-date copy of the film available."
The final version was still incomplete when the director died in March. It
arrived at the national archive, part of the British Film Institute, last
month after Warner Brothers helped speed through the final technical work in
the United States.
It will be shown at the National Film Theatre in London on 16 and 19
September as part of a retrospective coinciding with the release of
Kubrick's final film, Eyes Wide Shut. It is unique as Kubrick insisted on
improving the soundtrack by adding the Dolby noise reduction system to the
film's original sound system, which had itself been state-of-the-art when
the film opened in 1968.
During the agonising five-year process - much longer than normal for a new
print - the project became jokingly known as "the curse of Kubrick" because
of the never-ending demands of the legendary perfectionist. At one point,
Kubrick's producer, Jan Harlan, arrived at the BFI clutching a box into
which Kubrick had cut up the print to show where he was unhappy with shades
of green in some of the scenes. On other occasions, he made interminable
telephone calls to Mr Meeker at home.
The archive had wanted a pristine print as part of its plan to build a
collection of classic feature films, but the cost was significant as 2001
was made on 70mm film, an expensive format twice the width of ordinary film.
Mr Meeker, who saw the original London press screening in Soho, said that
two generations of film-lovers had not seen 2001 as Kubrick made it, because
most people had watched it in the smaller 35mm format.
Thanks to Complete Post/Bob Blanks for support in 1999
No advertising/marketing allowed on the main TIG. Contact rob at alegria.com
anonymous messaging now at http://www.alegria.com/HyperNews/get/ubique.html
1056 subscribers in 41 countries on Mon Aug 23 09:47:29 CDT 1999
subscribe/unsubscribe with that Subject: to telecine-request at alegria.com
complete information on the TIG website http://www.alegria.com/tig3/